Назад      Главная страница    Оглавление    Далее.

A lethal argument for the reversal of the whole story.

   On IT I came across by chance, today, 11/23/2011. Look at the comparison of these two chronologies taken from Wikipedia. Dare. We are forbidden to review this.
   A few days ago, in November 2011, a piece of the president's speech passed through the news, where he reports his extremely negative attitude towards the revisiting revision of history.

Comparison of the years of the reign of the Roman Kings (the era of the kings) and the French Merovingians.

- The first thing that is curious, the so-called. "the era of the Roman kings" in duration exactly coincides with the era of the Merovingians in France. That is 240 years. There are no more Roman kings, then emperors and others go further. It was she, the Merovingian age, that we took as the basis, for the truth, in the presentation of the True History of Mankind and Russia. You go to the same community. Read everything.
- Second, this is what every Roman "king" ruled in duration roughly as a "bundle" of several French kings. And only the very last "Roman king" is, as it were, a mirror image of the single, the very first Merovingian.
- Third, this is the fact that the years of the reign of each of these "Roman kings" (BC), to within a year or two, coincide with the years of rule of the "pack" of French Merovingians, are only mirrored in relation to the beginning of our era. Roman - BC, Merovingians - already in our era.
  Then the text from Wikipedia.
   Ancient Roman kings (Lat.Reges Romae) are the legendary and semi-legendary rulers of ancient Rome in the so-called tsarist period until the founding of the Republic. The Roman originals (including Titus Livius) mention the seven kings:
 

   The personalities of the Roman kings reflect the representations of the Romans about their distant ancestors. The kings themselves were later equated to the deities, their golden statues installed at the forum in Rome (they were melted down in 410 in order to pay off Alaric). Within the framework of the tsarist era, not only the state, but also the most important elements of the socio-political organization that developed in the Republican period, the Roman policy, arose.

P.S. Our comments.
1) Well, now we have an idea of ​​what "legendary" and "semi-legendary" Roman rulers are.
2) We now have an idea of ​​what "Roman original sources" and in particular "Titus Livius".
3) About the golden statues. Of course, everything was melted down! How else?! To pay off. Everything is corny. Nothing has changed with the passage of time. As they fought in the streets of BC, they fight in interstellar ships in Alpha Centauri ...
4) As a result of this manipulation alone, the history of Western European civilization is extended by 240 non-existent years. This is provided that all other chapters of Western history are true. In what there are strong doubts. Because it is thought that acting by the same method, it will be possible to find many other similar falsifications. Let's look.
5) In the light of the above, the version from Nosovsky-Fomenko about the triunity of our tsar Ivan the Terrible becomes very actual. Which ruled suspiciously long and was suspiciously of a different nature in various situations. A few more decades of government such as this and our kings will also gather "bundles" and there will be 3 to 4 tsars. The rest of Russian history will be melted down. And later the whole Russian people will be melted down.
   The era of crushed skulls continues. Is your skull still fractured? Then we fly to you by NATO aircraft.
   Is it too late for our rulers to take measures to strengthen the country's defense ?!

Назад      Главная страница    Оглавление    Далее.

Страница размещена на сайте в 2011 году.