Abstract. The occurrence of a magnetic field as a set of protruding parts of electrons is illustrated. The principle of operation of an electric motor and an electric generator is shown. The fact of the existence of an electric current, and the existence of a magnetic field around it, confirms the terrestrial nature of antimatter, that is, the possibility of a neutral rapprochement of two electrons. Whence follows the possibility of an attracting approach of an electron with an excited free electron.

(28-1)

(28-2)

A phenomenon known as electromagnetic induction is also known. It consists in the fact that if the flux of the vector of magnetic induction through a closed contour varies with time, then in this contour an EMF arises, generated by a vortex electric field, which arises from a change in the magnetic field with time.
 

What do we know about the nature of the magnetic field.
   That's what they write about the magnetic field in official sources.
- The magnetic field is deeply interrelated with the electric dynamically. That is, they mutually generate each other with alternating electric and magnetic fields.
- The magnetic field is deeply interrelated with the electric field and in the transition to a new frame of reference. The fact that the magnetic and electric fields are expressed through each other, that is, by and large, can not be unconditionally separated.
- A magnetic field is considered to be a special kind of matter, through which interaction between moving charges or currents is realized.
- Magnetic fields and in the special theory of relativity are a necessary consequence of the existence of electric fields.
- Together, the magnetic and electric fields form an electromagnetic field, manifestations of which are, in particular, light and all other electromagnetic waves.
   Well, here is something that can be unearthed?
 

Is there an "umbilical cord" between the current and the magnetic field?
   Let us try to understand within the framework of conventional physics how and by what means this connection is made between the electric current and the magnetic field generated by it. Why is the magnetic field so severely bound by the formula with the magnitude of the current? Why does it not depend on the properties of the conductor, that is, on the diameter, material or resistance of the conductor? Why such a strange direction of the magnetic field, necessarily perpendicular to the current? Whence does the magnetic field know the value of the current in the conductor? How does the magnetic field monitor the increase or decrease of current and proportionally increase or decrease its value? Why can not this field be deceived by changing the current in different time dependencies? So there is something that materially (or information) connects the electric current and the surrounding magnetic field. There is someone the third, the intermediary! But who is this third? More precisely, what is the third?
   The mediator's problem is not new. It arises in all matters of the propagation of fields and waves in space.

   Let us check whether this intermediary is an energy flow from the conductor to the surrounding magnetic field. After all, it is known that a thermal field is created around the conductor, conductors are heated and the flow of thermal energy from the conductor exists. Are not they of one origin?

   Question number 1. Is there a flow of electromagnetic energy from the conductor with direct current to the space to maintain the magnetic field around the conductor? Or in other words, the magnetic field around a conductor with a constant current, it takes energy from the conductor or not?
   We answer. Let us consider the phenomenon of superconductivity, for example, at minus 2700C, when practically any conductor becomes a superconductor. Under these conditions, there is no resistance in the conductor, there is no ambient air at such a low temperature, it condenses (vacuum), there is no flow of heat from the conductor, and the magnetic field around the conductor safely exists! This has long been tested experimentally and is used in the technique of electromagnets with superconducting windings. According to this experiment, it can be argued that to maintain a magnetic field around a conductor with a constant current, energy is not expended at all if the current is constant. Once energy is wasted when creating this field, when the current rises from zero to a stable value. The second time, the energy, on the contrary, is pumped to the electrical network when the current is turned off (induction). And in the interval between these events the magnetic field stably exists by itself and, as they say in the people, does not ask for food. There is no flow of electromagnetic energy (radiation) from the conductor to the space, if the current is constant.

   It's strange. It turns out that every "umbilical cord" between the field and the current is absent while the current is constant. But each time "umbilical cord" suddenly appears, if the current starts to increase or decrease.
    However, there is also a thermal interaction of the magnetic field with air molecules. What happens at -2700 and in a vacuum is one thing. And the fact that at room temperature and in the air - it's quite another.

   Question number 2. So, if the "umbilical cord" is cut off, and there is no energy exchange between the current and the magnetic field, then there is no exchange of information between them. Then, even if the current is constant, this magnetic field must eventually be absorbed by the air molecules. Or fly into space. A year passes, a hundred years, everything is forgotten for a long time, those who started this experiment died. A magnetic field is and is and is. And it does not change in size. Where does the field still know its value? Why does not it quiet down quietly? So, "umbilical cord" still remains?
   We answer. This contradiction can be explained by the assumption that the "umbilical cord" is invisible and not recorded. This is some kind of new matter.
   We come to the conclusion that the "magnetic" field recorded by us around the conductor is actually more complicated, two-component. We record only its magnetic component, but there is also another, unknown to us component of the field. Consequently, Maxwell's laws are not comprehensive. Or is this conclusion not correct?

   Question number 3. When the circuit breaks, the current stops almost instantaneously. The magnetic field disappears almost instantly. Where does it go? "For some reason, it's never usually been detailed by anyone." If the "umbilical cord" is cut off, then the field should probably fly off into space.
   We answer. It is known that an alternating current produces electromagnetic waves that escape into space. Confirmation of this seems to be the transmitting antennas, as well as easily detectable radio interference in the interruption of electrical circuits. However, the power of these antennas and interference, even with a decrease in distance, is for some reason negligible compared to the power of the original magnetic field. So not everything flies away. Very little flies. The field partially flies into space, and is partially absorbed by the conductor.

   Question number 4. Why is a stably existing and stationary magnetic field around the conductor not energized from the conductor (if the "umbilical cord" is cut off), when the current is cut off, it should instantaneously be accelerated to the speed of light and fly away in the form of a wave ?! It did not fly away before the current was turned off. What does it explode from within when the chain breaks and disperses this field? And here: if the entire field flies away, then why is the power of the antennas and interference radio waves so small when the circuit is broken?
   We answer. Summarizing all the arguments on questions 3 and 4, we made a compromise conclusion that the field partially, per cent by 10, flies into space in the form of an electromagnetic wave, and percent by 90, is absorbed back into the conductor. All requirements like are satisfied.

   However, in understanding the essence and nature of the umbilical cord, which connects the current and the magnetic field, we have not progressed. That is, within the framework of the generally accepted model of such a phenomenon as the electric current and the magnetic field around it, we can not answer the emerging question of an "umbilical cord" between the current and the magnetic field.
   Within the framework of the current physical paradigm, we can not get an answer to many questions of electromagnetism and other branches of physics.
Confirmation of the structure of the electron.
   In such cases, science teaches, it suggests that we need to change the paradigm, the model of the phenomenon. It is necessary to reconsider concepts, what is a current? What is a magnetic field? And reject the usual interpretations, because as a rule, it is the familiar concepts that prevent advancement in the matter of cognition.
   We discovered, long ago, that an electron has a structure. It has a large size. There is a hypothesis.

   Hypothesis. Because of the apparent observable connection between the current and the magnetic field, we assume that the current and the magnetic field are different manifestations, different faces, different parts of the same process - the motion of electrons.
   Since the current is the motion of electrons, it means the whole thing is in the electrons. Electrons have length and structure. They are something like hedgehogs. The trunk of the hedgehog runs inside the conductor (current), and the peripheral parts protrude far beyond the surface of the conductor and scratch our instruments recording the magnetic field. This scratch is recorded by the instruments as a magnetic field. More current - more hedgehogs or faster moving hedgehogs, stronger scratch.
   Thus, the theory of Gukuum has the answer: there is no purely magnetic field around the conductor with a constant current! In general, there is no pure magnetic field. Magnetic fields - this is the addition of billions of peripheral parts of the current in the conductor of electrons.
   Electrons, under the action of an electrical voltage in a conductor (or in a lightning!) Are lined up in chains. By the way, this fact, the existence of an electric current, and the existence of a magnetic field around it, confirms the terrestrial nature of antimatter, that is, the possibility of rapprochement of two electrons. But electrons have a structure. In lined electrons, all their peripheral regions (nonetheless making up these particles proper) are ordered and form some total ambient stress field in Gukuum, already macroscopic. We record it as a magnetic field.
   The total field around the current conductor, from which we only identify magnetic field with our magnetic arrows, is in fact not purely magnetic (purely shear in Gukuum), but is part of the moving electrons themselves, lined up in a chain.

Additionally. To the structure of an electron.
    Why does an electric motor work? Why does an electric current generator work? In order to understand all this, it is necessary to turn again to the structure of the electron.
    This is a portrait of an electron according to the theory of the elastic universe (the theory of Gukuum).

   As is known, in physics, mass and energy are one and the same, up to a multiplier.
   In terms of the mass of an electron or its internal energy, only the first 3 to 4 rings (see the figure) that cover 99% of the mass = the electron energy are important. The remaining rings are negligible. However, there are many electron conductors and the total interaction effect of the peripheral parts of electrons is manifested in the phenomena of electromagnetism. That is, in the phenomenon of the appearance of an electromagnetic field around a conductor with a current.
   In this unity and integrity of the mathematical solution lies the great strength of the electron. Electrons are able to line up in chains inside metal wires with voltage (current). And they are their peripheral parts - rings, by the serial number, not even by the first-second, not by the thousandth and not by the billion, but by the quintillion ones, 1) they create a magnetic field around the wires; 2) cling (in the literal sense!) To each other in the windings of electric motors and powerfully rotate their rotors, giving traffic to trains, escalators, construction cranes and submarines. That's what internal forces are in the electron!

 
   Here, in blue, two interacting conductors are depicted in the rotor and stator. The rotor and stator are designed in such a way that the currents in the vicinity of their windings are directed in opposite directions. It is not important at the same time, what currents, constant or variable. The electrons moving in them with their peripheral parts with terrible force press on the peripheral parts in another wire. At the same time, in each winding separately, the electrons move in one direction and do not interfere with each other.
   For the future. It is necessary to integrate the energy (mass) of a chain of electrons in the vicinity of a conductor with a current. That is, to find the total contribution of many electrons at a particular point. The dependence 1/r appears (most likely). This will confirm the hypothesis of the occurrence of a magnetic field, since the magnetic field also decreases as 1/r.

Опубликовано: https://www.academia.edu/34683374/A_conductor_with_current_and_a_magnetic_field

Назад    Главная страница     Оглавление     Далее