The problem is that God's model inevitably drags the Devil's model behind him. For in this world everything is so stupid that you begin to doubt, but why does God need all this? A lot can only be needed for the Devil.
   At the same time, scientific understanding removes the entire emotional color of events and becomes accessible to all people.
   There is a topic for discussion about "what was before, let's say, our universe, or what will happen to it in a distant future for many billions of years." Someone, with quite understandable goals, is trying to depict the beginning of the universe from a gigantic explosion. He finishes at least a giant collapse. At the same time, God is often the initiator of both. The collapse is presented as punishment for our sins. Accordingly, a big explosion was once a gift from God.
   From ancient times for all people there was always a border (for each person - its own!) Between what a person understands himself or in principle could understand if he had time and that his understanding is inaccessible and belongs to God. Originally the field of understanding was very narrow and God owned very much: fire; success on the hunt; the change of night and day; disease; dreams; sky and clouds, rain; and a lot more.
   With the development of science and the development of the human brain, the area belonging to God was moved further and further, first beyond the terrestrial atmosphere, and then beyond the solar system. On Earth, there remained only a small area for the existence of God - it is the "soul" of man, the very concept of "life." But as will be established in later chapters, these concepts also receive a scientific explanation. After expounding the Theory of Gukum and Theory of Life, the boundary of understanding is moved infinitely far away both in space and time, and there, infinitely far in the endless past, there is a "God" who hardly at least somehow influences at least something in this world. But we must not forget about Christ, who must live in the heart of every person. This is a completely different topic.
   Our life and civilization are far from being the only ones. There are infinitely many planets populated by living organisms and infinitely many intelligent civilizations. There are infinitely many civilizations that are smarter than us. But our concern that they will come and conquer us is more the result of cinematic propaganda, which pursues either commercial interest or is needed by someone for political purposes. And even if this happens, it is much more likely that these aliens will be left alive if we lead a righteous lifestyle. And if we are, as now, gnaw each other's throats, then how unreasonable animals all go to a leg or sausage products for newcomers.
   Despite the brevity of the life we ​​have given and the limitations of our minds, we can model quite a lot in our brain from the processes that are taking place around us. If the above universe is sufficient already above the above, a more approximate part of it can be investigated in more detail.
   If to be expressed figuratively, all cumulative human knowledge has some kind of bizarre spatial form. Rare people have exactly the same form of brain as the cumulative knowledge. Rather, even such people do not exist at all, because the process of evolution of the brain is far behind the scientific progress. Most often, in general, the volume of the brain is much less than the volume of knowledge, and therefore the brains of people seem to be stretched on knowledge like a rubber glove on a large hand. It's not up to the shape of the brain, it's good to just stretch without tearing ...
   But there are happy people who have "a small brain stem." And when their brains are wrapped around knowledge, this outgrowth will not be straightened, it will not disappear. As it would happen, if a normal person put on a six-fingered glove. And then the general knowledge can grow in this offshoot, the extra finger on the glove. So new knowledge and all subsequent brains are born - gloves will be stretched now and on this offshoot.
   The indicator of the lack of research in this or that field of science can be the amount of devilry and pseudoscientists in this field. Where is most of this shit now?
- In astronomy. The soothsisters, magicians, fortunetellers, astrologers and other charlatans are rampaging there. Somewhere there, God hides, and all his surroundings, and also places all the souls of the deceased - the righteous. From the mutual "sextile" of Jupiter and Mars depends on your success in business, and if you were born under an unhappy combination of planets, then go straight to the cemetery.
"The abyss of devilry," the afterlife, "" soul, "" heaven, "and" hell, "" psychics, "" magicians, "etc. - this is the science of life.The reviving corpses in American cinema are also from the same The modern achievements in chemistry, physics, cybernetics and genetics, quantum physics and related sciences allow to completely remove the veil from most of the main mysteries of life, which was done on the previous pages of this narrative.
   Human society in its composition is very diverse. Someone believes in God, and someone in the Devil. Someone shoots, and someone watches movies with reviving corpses. In this society there lives a small percentage of people who adequately perceive and correctly understand this world, people well-read and educated, including scientists who do not believe in any rubbish, but believe only in knowledge. These are materialists. But there are difficult years, when there are no discoveries and the movement of knowledge is inhibited. There are difficult tasks that can not be solved. There are paradoxes that nobody can explain. Maybe time is such that all the brains are thrown at the development of computer programs, rockets and cybernetics. May the life of mankind become full, not to science. Maybe all smart people had to leave to earn money. And maybe the genocide has already worked ... Where are the Newtons? Where are the Darwins? And then, to fool the head, so that the curious ones are left behind with their shame for their ignorance, ambiguous hypotheses of the "big bang" and the subsequent scattering of the fragments are invented. Or in biology - the "hypothesis of panspermia" and the like. Well, for small problems you can connect and witchcraft.
   But here, as wolves' ears protrude from under the sheep's skin, so do not such problems and phenomena as do not fit into any theory.

1. How old is the universe? Are there any other explanations for the redshift, explained by the flight after the "big bang". Well, somewhere there was an explosion, somewhere there is a red shift, but why introduce this phenomenon to the rank of the universal? Stronger than the cat is not a beast? Is it so true and global this continuously exaggerated crap? And before the explosion, it means nothing happened! Or there was a mysterious point, which for no apparent reason with a terrible force exploded. Here is a message from the Internet, Bakharev (bah1@mail.ru) - 22.02.2007 10:03: The red shift of the spectra of distant galaxies is a consequence of the energy loss of photons during the passage of cosmological distances through the structure of space. Let's add from ourselves: through the space background. And then there are no extensions or contractions of the universe.
    Here is an approximate dialogue between a "venerable Scientist" who has 300 to 700 publications and a high-brow "popular TV presenter," for example, in one nightly educational television program.
TV presenter: Tell me please, should the universe have been formed long ago? How else? Everything has its end and its beginning.
Scientist: Really, must! Well, how else?
TV presenter: All right. Now the universe can not be formed from anything else? Our experience teaches us that nothing comes of nothing ...
Scientist: Indeed, nothing can arise from nothing!
TV presenter: At the same time, since the universe was formed, so before it was not?
Scientist: That's right, colleague! Before the global primary explosion of the universe was not. (Then slyly, in Lenin's way, smiling with a squint): But there was something, but my friend ?! After all, nothing can arise from nothing ?!
TV presenter: So we come to the conclusion that initially there was no universe, but there was something. Are there any such objects that exist and at the same time do not exist?
Scientist: (Again cunningly so, in Lenin's, smiling): Of course, sir, my friend! This phenomenon is known in mathematics: it's POINT-C! A point is like nothing, and at the same time something. A point is that it has no parts. A point is that part of which is already nothing. This is where this elusive border between "something" and "nothing" is located.
TV presenter: So at first there was a point ?! After all, it turns out that the point can be formed from nothing ?!
Scientist: (Slyly so, with a squint): Well, the point, probably, can!
TV presenter: And what, after all, there are points on the window panes, on tomatoes, meat, school notebooks ...
The scientist: (In Stalin's way, seriously, without squinting, but with prischachivaniem): Well, you correctly think! And then this point exploded! Can a point explode or can not? The pomegranate of the revolutionary is small, and in fact, too, sometimes it will snap like a king's coach! And the point - it's nuclear, it's vigorous! She is hypertensive, she can billions, yes that billions, in sex-sex-stelliards times stronger than babakhnut!
Leading (Stunned by Stalin's charm): Indeed, now we and the viewers are all much clearer ...

   Our comment. Similarly, the appearance of life could be explained: first a point, and then microbes, amoebae, and then scientists dolbo ... all sorts of things came up.
   In general, this phenomenon is funny in this matter. All scientists, based on the knowledge accumulated by mankind, can not imagine a stable infinite and eternal Universe. How so? The universe must necessarily either fly apart, or collapse. And at the same time it is necessary to have a beginning, to emerge several billion years ago and necessarily to end in a few billion years. The other does not suggest any reflections and equations. Life experience - too, because in life everything is finite, unstable and necessarily one day it is created and later it collapses. Everything passes, and it will pass - the Bible tells us.
   It is unclear what exploded and why? But this is always said profoundly. "Era Planck", "Era De Sitter" ... There is only one "Era of the Marquis de Sade". Say, not everything that happens in the world can be accommodated in the human brain. There are things incomprehensible, which can only be ascertained, which you just need to remember, memorize by heart, in which you only need to believe. What's easier: the point exploded, the universe was scattered and formed. "Ilimintarno"! "Apparently"! You do not agitate for us only for the Soviet power (or in our time - for democracy) !! Any point that is now flying around the room can explode and give rise to a new universe! At any time, a microscopic black hole can now just now pierce the whole globe and think what to do next. You Poal (Ie I understand) ?!
   Yes, there in our village, too, such a miracle was: one cow farted, and the horns fell off ... And the bull began as a stallion, with apples, a pound!
2. Physical paradoxes, which led to the theory of Einstein. Is this the only explanation for them only by the theory of relativity? Until now, this theory of relativity is difficult to comprehend. Even Einstein himself said: since mathematics began to become a theory of relativity, I no longer understand it myself. Although it is supported by a certain part of the scholarly community, after all, his man opened ... And again everyone is shouting "Ilimintarno"! "Apparently"!

3. The global structure of the universe, established 25 years ago, looks like a soap foam, where the bubbles are billions of light emptiness, and the walls are filled with clusters of galaxies. Unfortunately, we are not remembered by the author of the publication in the journal "Nature" of the late Soviet period. It seems that, at first glance, galaxies should strive to "gather together". It is this that constantly and frightens us. Say, again, all shrink into the ku ... that is, to the point. Although we, Russians, have been in the pile for some time already.
4. The double, particle-wave nature of elementary particles. To this all somehow used to. There is a black and white color, hot-cold water, a short-long road ... What, there is nothing like this? But at least there are rubber-metal shock absorbers, chocolate-peanut snickers and chipboards!
5. These square roots. Perhaps an additional, implicit stimulus to the search for another model of the universe is some indigestibility of the formulas of Einstein's theory. Why should God so complicate the device of the world ?!
   Of course, Einstein's merit is great. He realized that there is something wrong in this world, not the mechanistic behavior of material objects. But he preferred an explanation close to human psychology, pushing the incomprehensible moments into the mathematical jungle. Just as in ancient times Ptolemy made a complex system of revolution of the planets and the Sun around the Earth, close and understandable to people, but very complex mathematically, with sudden loops in the middle of the trajectory. So also to all known square roots in Einstein's theory are phenomena of the same order with Ptolemy's loops. Einstein took as a basis a very sweet heart of the philistine statement that the material bodies move in the void, without encountering resistance. At the same time, they do not change the length during the movement, because they are in themselves material and absolute. And the experimentally observed change in length was easily explained by the fact that this change in length is only apparent, that it occurs only from the point of view of the external observer, and is explained by the differences in the course of the clock and so on. The square roots were obtained.
   The authors propose another, simple and understandable theory, albeit very humiliating for the human psyche.
   When one person explains something to another, the second person begins to understand only when he feels that the former ceases to believe in what he explains. This is our personal life experience and the law of Nature.

   Another interesting fact is also interesting. The Universe is full of maths. And not just mathematicians, but amateurs pozhonglirovat tensors; abstract from reality; come up with a lot of obscure definitions; to invent to the already existing operators of type "Δ" or "▼" several more mathematical operators of the "curl" type and even more ridiculous; with ease to introduce into the theory new types and types of interaction fields and attribute to them completely unexpected properties; to abandon experimental physical laws; To draw behind the ears the results of contradictory experiments to their theory; do everything - everything - everything is relative, vague, meaningless; and most importantly - the rest of his life to fight for the popularization of his theory, despite disproving results. There are almost no physicists on the problem of the device of the universe. Maybe this is the reason for the phenomenon that Nobel denied mathematicians his prize? And they are now looking for material well-being in physics?
   These mathematicians, distracted from reality, shake and shovel formulas, and after finding some new formula, they start to think out a meaning for it. If the graph goes to infinity, it means "Era Plank", "Era De Sitter". If in the minus-infinity, then "Black Hole" and the like. Especially in honor in the scientific journals loaders and carriers of tensors. Behind the authorities in the rewrapping of the formulas, the jugglers are more eager to sing along. And now the entire academic choir is dragging out:
   We are not afraid of a black hole,
There will come the Planck Era and the era of Sitter!
  Humanity is so arranged that all of its cumulative knowledge and all its skills, accumulated over the centuries, are distributed between library storages and individuals. Of course, people play the main role. Each person knows to the best of his interests and abilities both about things global (there are not many of them) and small ones (there are a lot of them). Between people there is a certain trust in the knowledge of others, as a result, sometimes phrases are not made by specialists in the field they are pronounced mechanically, without a deep understanding of their meaning. Once taken on faith, someone's theory may be wrong. Therefore, another the leadership of the authors to the case was the thesis that believe first and foremost, and then authority.
   Scientists know that there are and from time to time new truths appear that shock with their novelty, depth and strength. Once upon a time there was a problem about dominoes that shocked me with my decision. She was told by a classmate, whom I still have to kick in the ass (this is the mores of FizTech). Someday I will return. Formulation of the problem. If you put the bones of the dominoes on top of each other, pushing the upper one in the same direction, then how far can this visor come out? On the whole bone? To two? - Decision. It turns out that it is infinitely far away! If the process is carried out "back to front", slipping under the already firmly lying, already complex and large visor another bone with a slight shift, extending this visor. The sum of these shifts is infinite, since it is formed from the logarithmic series ½ + 1/3 + ¼ + 1/5 ...
   There is another, also infinite, solution with the construction of a column with the bulge sticking out more and pushing it from above with a high column of domino bones. But it's not interesting.
  The authors offer a small "paradox". It is known that in the 20th generation, if you take it from the past, all the residents of the country are relatives. That is, already now all Russians are relatives. A new consequence: we have children, three of them. Consequently, in 20 generations, in just 500 years, we will be great-great-20 times-grandfathers and grandmothers of all future Russians! Not weak? So are the Americans. So, in 500 years, all Americans will be able to look at their great-great (20 times) -free, frozen now in liquid nitrogen. And when it is thawed, he can come to visit any American family as a direct relative, a scumbag.
   Argument to those who ask: why exactly did you open all this? - EY answers, she draws well. You see my face? Well see? Can you describe it in words? - You can. Now draw to make it look like ... Draw my face to become recognizable and there was no cartoon. Rarely who can, this is very difficult. And chatter about the face, what it is wide or oblong, courageous or beautiful, clever or open etc. - it's all possible. And many people are able to draw cartoons, although even this is not easy.
   We express satisfaction that all our theories were born in our country, the country of Orthodoxy and Materialism, the country where all world religions converge in Russia. They could not have been born in the West, although rich, but false and idealistic. A full stomach science does not accept. They could not have been born in the East, in Asia, where science has an even more miserable existence than in Russia, in Russia.
   But nothing lasts forever in this world.