устройство вселенной, внутреннее устройство элементарных частиц, портреты элементарных частиц, the essence of universe, the inner device and portraits of elementary particles

Назад Главная страница Оглавление Далее

Candidates for elementary particles. Portraits of elementary particles.

Abstract. The first stage of search and identification of elementary particles is made among the solutions of the wave equation. The origin of the core is explained. Portraits of elementary particles are obtained.

Portraits of elementary particles and hydrogen atoms.
The behavior of each of the previously presented functions E(q) is of little interest. All of them come out of zero and with small variations asymptotically approach the total energy of the lok, determined by formulas (1-23), (1-26), (1-31). The behavior of the integrands ρ(q), that is, the energy density of the lok, is of interest.
OPENING №2. It turns out that almost all randomly taken loks have a zero radial density (hole) in the center. That is, like empty balls inside or more complex figures, still empty inside. Including lok (0,0) and loks with large (j,m). But loks (1,0) and (1,1) have solid centers, "cores". Only these two loks.
So what? Whether it is not enough what there are loks? - However, even up to this point, there were a lot of arguments from physics in favor of the theory of gukuum ([22] - [25]). And these two last do not surprise. These loks with the core turned out to be not zero, not one and not three-ten-infinity. And exactly two. It's like winning a grand prize in the lottery.

For future historians. It was the end of February or even the beginning of March 2003. Enthusiasm after the discovery of the law of winding gradually subsided, as there were no new flashes ahead. I still did not know anything and did not open it and did not prove it. I dealt with the problem from time to time, half the time, as an amateur, especially not hoping for success. And certainly not even dreamed of some Nobel Prizes. Yes, he simply fulfilled his duty to himself (from the past, from the third year of the institute). Then, in 1974, I wanted to test the hypothesis of the Elastic Universe, but then it was not real because of the awkwardness of the formulas. So I'll check now to clear my conscience, I'll make sure that it was not serious and I'll finish it. I could easily abandon everything. The economic situation in the country was poor. Our financial situation did not allow us to spend an appreciable amount of time on science. Year 2003, the beginning, the winter, most recently came Putin and the whole economy was in decline. I did not know yet that Putin was the end of my scientific hopes. That they with Velikhov and Alferov have already come up with the "Global Energy" award. Putin ordered the academicians not to award this prize to themselves. But academics will not listen and will reward only themselves. And all competitors - mercilessly wiped from the possibility of publication. Poverty, uncertainty, instability. The program on my computer was an old version, it might not work at the singularity point or even lie, and I would gradually abandon this whole thing. Yes, the computer did not work right away, I had to go through various possibilities. I plotted the density functions of several loks from the dimensionless radius. Zero densities at zero radius for several functions were obtained. For some one, the graph at zero has gone to infinity. This departure to infinity is very grievous, because in Nature nothing goes to infinity. And consequently he foreshadowed failure. I still did not think anything and especially did not believe in the Elastic Universe. Well, I think, okay. But it is interesting, but how is that lok that the density at the zero point goes to infinity, what kind of lok does this mass get? Now, if the mass goes to infinity, then I will finish all my attempts with the Elastic Universe. The program was bad, the used computer, also obsolete, was bought in the Mitin market cheaply. Everything was considered bad and long, because there was a singularity. It was possible to calculate only a numerical example, although the program can work with formulas if there are no singularities. So, the computer gave out on the screen on a teaspoon in a minute, a stroke after a stroke, only the approximate numerical result. And gradually gave out, after 15 minutes of reflection, a dotted line leading from right to left to the Y axis, similar to the graph of the cosine function. That is, not leaving at zero to infinity, but giving an intersection with the Y axis. Well, I also looked at this chart for a few minutes, I think: it's funny how this chart for some reason did not go to infinity. Probably something mixed up with the formulas. After all, often in the process of forgetting the very purpose of the work, and working mechanically. Even, it seems somewhere retired for something. No deep conclusions, the head is half asleep. Suddenly, from somewhere in the depths of the brain, a cry, while looking at the dotted line, resting on the axis of the Y: "Lord, that's the hard middle, Kern!" Do you remember Yavorsky's handbook of the 70s? This is it you bought it in the Dolgoprudny bookstore! What do you think you're a fool about? That's it, what you dreamed about the whole previous life! And then I quickly checked a dozen of the available density distribution formulas for different Loks. The benefit of their work was a pleasant affair and I counted them and saved up a lot of them. I checked and made sure that only two formulas of them have cores. Only two, and all the rest - with holes in the middle. And these two are not some and from where it got, namely (1,0) and (1,1), that is from the very beginning. These two - one of them is a neutron, and someone is a proton. At these moments I flew around the apartment on the wings. I was in euphoria, I felt the tides of happiness. I did not think how many disappointments I have to make these discoveries reach humanity. And how will I ruin the family in this crazy race, between the melting revenues of the family; between melting health from diabetes and from continuous sitting at the computer; and the need to bring everything to mind, to a high level, in everything, to double-check, arrange, and publish for your own money. And with it, without fail, to inform the entire scientific community, write letters to all instances, send the article to official journals. And thank you to my wife, she never peeped or roared, that I was ruining my family, squandering money and time. And silently did all the work to maintain the vitality of our family, all five. We all fed her nested dolls and we never asked or borrowed from anyone ... But with the electron turned out to be more complicated, there was a lot of loks with holes in the middle. And for some reason Lok (0,0), in spite of its obvious excretion, I did not like very much.

PROOF. Only this phenomenon, two loks with a core, is already the strongest confirmation of the correctness of the chosen path: the theory of gukuum.
Treasures are close and breathing is becoming more frequent. I want to go to the run. It is assumed that lok (1,0) is a neutron, and lok (1,1) is a proton. Also, taking into account the simplest device, isolation from among others, it is assumed that the lok (0,0) is an electron. This empty object, close to the sphere, only the density is concentrated at the equator.

   First identification: by density.
   So, the first step begins to test our assumptions as to which lok is an elementary particle. The distributions of the density of elementary particles with density distributions in loks are compared.
    There are experimental data on the "structure of nucleons." For example, the reference book of the 1980 sample [10]. Those, fiztekhov's books, were there and left after graduation. And this directory was later bought specially in the second-hand book department. It is necessary to express huge gratitude to Mr.Yavorsky for his increased interest in the structure of elementary particles and the presentation of his knowledge in textbooks and reference books. In the 1970s, these areas of physics were completely closed all over the world. The information and graphics from this source are used below.

1. Proton candidate verification. Comparison of mass distributions.

COMMENTS. Obviously, the graph shows the core, as well as some local elevations, which are still candidates for the charge carrier and the pion cloud. It is only necessary to compare the sizes. This will be done below.

2. Check of candidate for electron. Comparison of mass distributions.

COMMENTS. There is no complete clarity with the electron, since there are no experimental data. So far, according to the theory of gukuum, it turns out that an electron is an empty tennis ball inside, covered with several layers of very soft, suede layers of a larger size. Indeed, the "atmosphere" of lok (0,0) is very transparent. Its size is large (this will be seen from the following, f.(1-56)). A good form for the formation of a hydrogen atom. Just put a tight lok (1,1) inside the lok (0,0) and the atom is ready. Also a good form for having a very large spin at such a small mass.
This graph will be needed when estimating the effective size of an electron (1-56).

3. Verification of the candidate for neutron. Comparison of the mass distribution.

COMMENTS. Indeed, it is difficult to detect experimentally the difference in the distribution of the proton and neutron masses. But according to the schedule, this difference is noticeable. The second layer of the neutron is noticeably thicker.
   If you look closely at the graph on the right, then there is an assumption that a neutron is a very tight "dance" of a proton with an electron. The first maximum of the graph is like an internal proton. And in the second maximum of the chart, the electron enveloping the partner is viewed. Of course, they strongly deform when connected. The electron contracts. The mass flows partly from the proton to the electron. This dance is unstable in its free form. Perhaps because of the fact that the electron in this dance is heavily "clamped" and wants to escape from the embrace of the partner. And there is another, cooler, but much more stable dance of a proton and an electron, called the hydrogen atom. Without mutual overflow of mass.
   Later. By the way, the instability of a free neutron - is this not a refutation of Coulomb's law ?!
PROOF. The presence of three density layers for candidates for a proton and a neutron and a large electron size, which coincides with the experimental data and assumptions, is the second proof of the correctness of the theory of gukuum.
   Чтобы провести идентификацию по всем признакам, нужно научиться вычислять другие параметры локов кроме их массы. В частности, моменты импульса локов.

Portraits of electron, neutron and proton.

THE BIBLE: ALL THE CURVE WILL EAT.

   Of course, all the below portraits are very approximate, although the formulas allow you to make absolutely accurate portraits. But there is no time for this, as well as much more.
   Electron portrait. That's how it looks like an increase of about 10¹⁶ times. The portrait was kindly made back in 2004 by the ninth-grader Churlaev Pasha Alexandrovich using computer 3D graphics.
   These are nested spherical fragments. But in these spherical fragments the density decreases up and down along the axis of symmetry, that is, the main density is concentrated near the horizontal plane of symmetry, therefore spherical fragments are depicted here as rings. These rings reflect the electron density distribution. All rings rotate about the vertical axis at light speed. The direction of rotation of the neighboring rings is the opposite (this follows from the mathematical formula for solving the wave equation). No "separation" of layers from each other is impossible. It is strictly one whole. Although very distant layers may be detached in electrical processes, especially in electric motors, they quickly "grow back" like tails in lizards.

Figure 6. Portrait of electron.

Neutron portrait. This is the shape of a neutron. Geometrically, these are nested within each other. They rotate about the vertical axis Z, alternately in opposite directions, which in the sum gives a zero charge, and almost zero, but not exactly zero spin. In the center is a very massive core - the core. On linear dimensions, it is about 12 times smaller than an electron. All spheres rotate around the vertical axis at light speed. The direction of rotation of neighboring spheres is the opposite. No "separation" of layers from each other is impossible. It is strictly one whole.

Figure 7. Portrait of neutron.

Portrait of Proton. The situation with the proton is not quite certain. Everything depends on the so far unknown ratio of the elasticity coefficients of Lame L₁ and L₂ for the gukuum. If they are equal to each other, L₁≈L₂ (as in steel, "steel Gukuum." So it seems to us, from the principle of beauty of the universe, and also because the steel is the product of Gukuum, the apple from the apple tree ...), then the portrait of the proton is close to the portrait of a neutron, only a little more (Figure 3). If L₁<L₂, or more so L₁<<L₂, then the proton acquires a cross-like appearance, as in Fig.4. With small crosswise stretches or compressions (about 30%) along the coordinate axes. The situation when L₁>>L₂, is impossible, since it would be an ether. Neighboring layers rotate in opposite directions. No "separation" of the layers from each other is possible (as in a neutron). It is strictly one whole.

Figure 8. Portrait of proton.

Figure 9. Any possible section of proton if L₁<<L₂ .

A portrait of the hydrogen atom. Traditionally, everyone thinks that an electron must revolve around a proton. Nothing like this. Here is an image of the atom, popular from ancient times:

- there is a complete non-correspondence of reality. From now on and forever: electrons as a whole do not revolve around the nucleus. In any atom, the nucleus is inside many electronic clouds, which are actually material electrons, and not virtual objects.
Explanations. Inside, in the middle, a little yellow is a proton. Around him is a large, but very rarefied - electron. And the electron as a whole does not revolve around the proton, but simply itself is a localized wave object.

Figure 10. Portrait of hydrogen.

Below: pages from the Yavorsky reference book from 1980. I used in the students an even earlier edition, it also had a core for nucleons. In later editions, this information is destroyed.

Опубликовано: https://www.academia.edu/34505364/Candidates_for_elementary_particles._Portraits_of_elementary_particles

Назад Главная страница Оглавление Далее

Страница размещена на сайте в мае 2005 года